How does itwork?
Just upload your manuscript or draft and Theo will suggest the journals that best match your research. Then use Theo’s pre-submission review to assess the submission readiness of your manuscript.
Try Journal Finder
JOURNAL FINDER
Publish your research where it has impact. Our AI-powered Journal Finder helps you find the highest-impact journals to publish your research.
Trusted by more than 30,000 academics at leading universities






IN SHORT
An AI journal finder matches your manuscript to the journals where it best fits and has the most impact. Thesify’s Journal Finder reads your abstract or full draft and recommends the best-matching journals by scope, impact factor and rejection rate — then lets you run a pre-submission review before you submit.
Just upload your manuscript or draft and Theo will suggest the journals that best match your research. Then use Theo’s pre-submission review to assess the submission readiness of your manuscript.
Try Journal Finder
Every suggestion comes with the numbers you would otherwise gather by hand: how closely the journal’s published work matches yours, its impact factor, how much it publishes and how selective it is. Weigh reach against realistic odds in one view instead of across a dozen publisher websites.
Compare JournalsPicking the venue is only half the decision. Run a pre-submission review against the manuscript you are about to send, fix what a reviewer would flag, and submit knowing the paper is as strong as the shortlist you chose it for.
Run a Pre-Submission Review
WHAT YOU SEE FOR EVERY JOURNAL
Journal Finder is publisher-independent, so a shortlist reflects your manuscript rather than someone’s catalogue. Each candidate is presented with the same facts, in the same place.
How closely the work the journal already publishes matches the content of your manuscript — meaning, not keywords.
What the journal says it publishes, so you can rule out a mismatch before an editor does it for you.
The visibility side of the trade-off, shown next to the fit score rather than instead of it.
How much the journal publishes each year — a small, highly selective venue is a different bet from a large one.
How selective the journal is, so your shortlist has realistic options alongside the ambitious one.
A pre-submission review of the manuscript itself, so the paper matches the venue you picked for it.
WHY JOURNAL FINDER
Submitting to the wrong venue costs a submission cycle: weeks in an editorial queue, a desk rejection on scope, and a round of reformatting before you can try again. A shortlist built on fit avoids all three.
Get the most attention for your research by submitting to the venue that fits it best — including conference proceedings, not only journals.
Theo matches on what your research says rather than the words it uses, so relevant venues outside the obvious shortlist still surface.
Check journal scope, impact factor, publication volume and rejection rates at a glance, before you commit to a template and a queue.
Pair the shortlist with Theo’s pre-submission review so the manuscript is ready for the venue you chose for it.

Andy Stapleton
@DrAndyStapleton
It is the academic tool kit we have been waiting for. There's so many ways you could use this, but ultimately, for what it does - give you feedback, making sure you're meeting academic standards - it doesn't get much better at the moment.

Neha Agrawal
@WiseUpCommunications
I was super impressed with the evaluation because it was able to pick up minute, yet important gaps in my research, which even a well-read professor would have missed out. With this kind of in-depth feedback, you can be quite sure that your work is going to meet the requirements of your supervisor and peer-review process of journals.

Amina Yonis
@DrAminaYonis
It's a beautiful tool because it not only enhances your writing but also increases your confidence by maintaining your unique tone while explaining the rationale behind each improvement.
As seen in





SUBMITTING TO A JOURNAL?
Our Journal Submission track adds journal matching and reviewer-style feedback built specifically for manuscripts headed out the door.
Explore Journal SubmissionJournal Finder compares the content of your manuscript with the work each journal actually publishes and ranks candidates by semantic similarity — the meaning of your research, not the keywords in your title. Fit is then shown alongside impact factor, publication volume and rejection rate so you can weigh reach against realistic acceptance odds yourself.
No. Journal Finder is publisher-independent: no journal pays to appear, and no publisher’s portfolio is favoured. The shortlist you see reflects your manuscript, which is the whole point of using it instead of a publisher’s own matching tool.
No. An abstract or a working draft is enough for a useful shortlist, which is often when the choice of venue still shapes how you write. As the manuscript develops you can re-run the match and see whether the shortlist has moved.
Yes. Conference venues are matched the same way, which matters in fields where proceedings carry as much weight as journals. Our Conference Submission track goes further for work aimed at a specific event.
No tool can, and any that claims to is guessing. What Journal Finder does is narrow the field to venues where your work genuinely fits and show you how selective each one is — then the pre-submission review helps you fix the weaknesses that cause rejections before an editor sees them.
Yes. Uploads are encrypted, never shared with publishers or anyone else, and never used to train AI models. You can delete a document at any time.
Find the right journal for your research — before you submit.
Get Started