CONFERENCE SUBMISSIONS

Don't get desk-rejectedfor something avoidable.

Conference deadlines don't move. Catch formatting, anonymization, and clarity issues before submission — not after a desk reject with no appeal.

Trusted by Researchers Submitting to Top-Tier Conferences

EPFLHarvardOxfordETH ZurichUCLCambridge

AUTOMATED PRE-FLIGHT CHECK

Everything reviewers are told to flag — checked before you submit.

Program committees now instruct reviewers to check for these exact issues and desk-reject on sight. Thesify Reviewer checks for all of them first.

Anonymization is intact

No first-person self-citations, tracked links, or acknowledgments that could deanonymize you — the exact things reviewers are told to flag on sight.

Style file & page limit match

Checked against the current official template — not last year's version. Margin or font tweaks are a common, avoidable desk-reject trigger.

Required sections are present

Paper checklists, ethics statements, and limitations sections are often mandatory — missing one can mean automatic rejection, no review.

Citations are real and accurate

Every reference is checked against actual literature — no hallucinated citations, a growing concern reviewers are now told to watch for.

Framing is reviewer-ready

Clear in the first page, because reviewers are skimming dozens of submissions and won't dig for your contribution.

BUILT FOR RESEARCHERS

Wherever you are before the deadline.

First-Time Submitters

Submitting to a top-tier venue for the first time and don't want a formatting mistake to end it before review.

"It caught a self-citation that would have broken anonymity — I had no idea that counted."

— PhD Candidate, Machine Learning

Repeat Submitters

Submitting to multiple deadlines a year and want the format check automated instead of re-reading the CFP every time.

"Every submission gets checked against the exact style file — one less thing to double-check at 2am."

— Postdoc, Computer Vision

Co-Authors & Labs

Coordinating a multi-author submission and want every section anonymized and formatted the same way before the deadline.

"It flagged a citation format issue in a co-author section that we would have missed."

— Lab Manager, AI Research Group

International Researchers

Confident in the results — want a clarity check that won't cost points with a reviewer skimming dozens of papers.

"It caught phrasing that would have read as unclear to a rushed reviewer."

— PhD Candidate, Robotics

As seen in

NatureForbesUSA Today20 MinutenBerner Zeitung

Reviewers spend20 minutes with your paper.

Conference reviewers are buried in submissions and reading fast. If your framing isn't clear in the first page, you're relying on luck — not merit.

Check My Paper
Conference feedback interface screenshot

Tweaking the style fileis grounds for desk rejection.

Shrinking margins to fit one more paragraph, or using last year's template, is explicitly called out in submission guidelines as a reason for rejection without review — no appeal, no exceptions.

Verify My Formatting
Formatting feedback screenshot

A hallucinated citationis a red flag reviewers now hunt for.

Reviewer guidelines now explicitly ask reviewers to check for fabricated or misattributed references. Thesify verifies every citation against real literature before a reviewer has the chance to catch it first.

Verify My Citations
Citation verification screenshot

The review process is noisier than you think.

Published reviewer-variance studies at NeurIPS found that a large share of accepted papers would have been rejected by a different set of reviewers. You can't control that noise — but you can control whether an avoidable mistake costs you the round.

~50%

of accepted NeurIPS papers, in published experiments, would have been rejected by a different reviewer panel

0 Appeals

for desk rejections caused by formatting, anonymization, or missing required sections

Minutes

to catch the avoidable issues — before reviewer variance is even a factor

Check My Submission

How does it work?

Thesify checks your paper against your target conference's own rules — before you submit.

01

Upload your document

Begin by uploading your academic work — whether it's a thesis chapter, research paper, or grant proposal. Thesify securely handles your file, ensuring your content remains private and protected.

Upload your document

02

Get a full compliance + feedback report

Thesify checks anonymization, style file, page limits, required sections, and citation accuracy — then gives structured feedback on argument and clarity, all in one pass.

Get a full compliance + feedback report

03

Revise and refine

Use the feedback to make targeted improvements. Address key issues, strengthen your arguments, and ensure your writing aligns with academic standards.

Revise and refine

Ready to submit your paper?

Get Started

Frequentlyasked questions.

Is Thesify just ChatGPT for academics? +

No — and the difference matters. ChatGPT generates text and frequently invents citations that don't exist. Thesify is built specifically for academic writing, grounded in a database of 200 million peer-reviewed articles, and never fabricates references. Think of it less as a writing tool and more as a 24/7 academic advisor who has read the literature in your field.

Am I at risk of academic misconduct by using Thesify? +

Thesify reviews and improves your own writing. It supports revision decisions rather than replacing your authorship.

Is my research kept private? +

Privacy is a core product promise. Your uploaded work and generated feedback are treated as your work.

Do I need to download Thesify? +

No. Thesify runs in the browser.

academic integrity.

Your research stays yours.

Get Started