Anonymization is intact
No first-person self-citations, tracked links, or acknowledgments that could deanonymize you — the exact things reviewers are told to flag on sight.
CONFERENCE SUBMISSIONS
Conference deadlines don't move. Catch formatting, anonymization, and clarity issues before submission — not after a desk reject with no appeal.
Trusted by Researchers Submitting to Top-Tier Conferences






AUTOMATED PRE-FLIGHT CHECK
Program committees now instruct reviewers to check for these exact issues and desk-reject on sight. Thesify Reviewer checks for all of them first.
No first-person self-citations, tracked links, or acknowledgments that could deanonymize you — the exact things reviewers are told to flag on sight.
Checked against the current official template — not last year's version. Margin or font tweaks are a common, avoidable desk-reject trigger.
Paper checklists, ethics statements, and limitations sections are often mandatory — missing one can mean automatic rejection, no review.
Every reference is checked against actual literature — no hallucinated citations, a growing concern reviewers are now told to watch for.
Clear in the first page, because reviewers are skimming dozens of submissions and won't dig for your contribution.
BUILT FOR RESEARCHERS
Submitting to a top-tier venue for the first time and don't want a formatting mistake to end it before review.
"It caught a self-citation that would have broken anonymity — I had no idea that counted."
— PhD Candidate, Machine Learning
Submitting to multiple deadlines a year and want the format check automated instead of re-reading the CFP every time.
"Every submission gets checked against the exact style file — one less thing to double-check at 2am."
— Postdoc, Computer Vision
Coordinating a multi-author submission and want every section anonymized and formatted the same way before the deadline.
"It flagged a citation format issue in a co-author section that we would have missed."
— Lab Manager, AI Research Group
Confident in the results — want a clarity check that won't cost points with a reviewer skimming dozens of papers.
"It caught phrasing that would have read as unclear to a rushed reviewer."
— PhD Candidate, Robotics
As seen in





Conference reviewers are buried in submissions and reading fast. If your framing isn't clear in the first page, you're relying on luck — not merit.
Check My Paper
Shrinking margins to fit one more paragraph, or using last year's template, is explicitly called out in submission guidelines as a reason for rejection without review — no appeal, no exceptions.
Verify My Formatting
Reviewer guidelines now explicitly ask reviewers to check for fabricated or misattributed references. Thesify verifies every citation against real literature before a reviewer has the chance to catch it first.
Verify My Citations
Published reviewer-variance studies at NeurIPS found that a large share of accepted papers would have been rejected by a different set of reviewers. You can't control that noise — but you can control whether an avoidable mistake costs you the round.
~50%
of accepted NeurIPS papers, in published experiments, would have been rejected by a different reviewer panel
0 Appeals
for desk rejections caused by formatting, anonymization, or missing required sections
Minutes
to catch the avoidable issues — before reviewer variance is even a factor
Thesify checks your paper against your target conference's own rules — before you submit.
01
Begin by uploading your academic work — whether it's a thesis chapter, research paper, or grant proposal. Thesify securely handles your file, ensuring your content remains private and protected.

02
Thesify checks anonymization, style file, page limits, required sections, and citation accuracy — then gives structured feedback on argument and clarity, all in one pass.

03
Use the feedback to make targeted improvements. Address key issues, strengthen your arguments, and ensure your writing aligns with academic standards.

No — and the difference matters. ChatGPT generates text and frequently invents citations that don't exist. Thesify is built specifically for academic writing, grounded in a database of 200 million peer-reviewed articles, and never fabricates references. Think of it less as a writing tool and more as a 24/7 academic advisor who has read the literature in your field.
Thesify reviews and improves your own writing. It supports revision decisions rather than replacing your authorship.
Privacy is a core product promise. Your uploaded work and generated feedback are treated as your work.
No. Thesify runs in the browser.
Your research stays yours.
Get Started